Single customer relationship results in zero value

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 9 No. 11
Legal and Court Case Update
November 2003

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (268 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
4213 Trucking, Except Local
484121 General Freight Trucking, Long-Distance, Truckload
marital dissolution/divorce
personal goodwill, marital dissolution, court appointed expert
Moore v. Moore
2003 Ohio 3320, 2003 Ohio App. LEXIS 3047
June 26, 2003
US
State Court
Ohio
Court of Appeals
Daniel Thompson (for husband)
Walters

Summary

Trial court did not err in adopting zero valuation where appraiser considered nature of trucking company and that its revenue was from a single customer.

See Also

Moore v. Moore

Full Text of Court Cases
June 26, 2003

Issue is whether trial court erred in relying on expert valuation of zero based on fact that company only had one customer and business depended on husband's relationship with customer.