Should ‘Highest and Best Use’ Govern Fair Value Standard in Dissenting Shareholder Case?

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 14 No. 9
Legal and Court Case Update
September 2008

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (694 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8051 Skilled Nursing Care Facilities
shareholder dissent/oppression
Holiday Medical Center v. Weisman (I)
2008 WL 2677504
July 10, 2008
US
State Court
New Jersey
Superior Court
J. Bradford McIlvain
CBIZ Valuation Group, LLC
Parrillo, Gilroy, Baxter

Summary

New Jersey court considers whether “highest and best use” is appropriate standard in shareholder dissent cases.

See Also

Holiday Medical Center v. Weisman (I)

Full Text of Court Cases
July 10, 2008

New Jersey court considers whether “highest and best use” is appropriate standard in shareholder dissent cases.