Reasonable Royalty Based on Hypothetical Negotiation

Business Valuation Update BVLaw
Legal and Court Case Update
December 20, 2001

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (406 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7372 Prepackaged Software
511210 Software Publishers
intellectual property
Interactive Pictures Corp. v. Infinite Pictures, Inc.
No. 01-1029 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
US
Federal Court
Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Donald L. Martin, Ph.D.
Lourie

Summary

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s reasonable royalty award for patent infringement based on a hypothetical negotiation. The court concluded that a paid up royalty of 10% over five years was appropriate. The aw ...

See Also

Interactive Pictures Corp. v. Infinite Pictures, Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
December 20, 2001

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s reasonable royalty award for patent infringement based on a hypothetical negotiation. The court concluded that a paid up royalty of 10% over five years was appropriate. The aw ...

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition