Proper Valuation Evidence Critical for Intangible Asset Loss Deduction

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 10 No. 5
Legal and Court Case Update
May 2004

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (580 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6321 Accident and Health Insurance
524114 Direct Health and Medical Insurance Carriers
federal taxation
income tax
Capital Blue Cross v. Commissioner
122 T.C. No. 11, 2004 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 11
March 12, 2004
US
Federal Court
United States Tax Court
Adam Trevor Ackerman, James D. Hill, Peter H. Winslow, Robin L. Herrell, Ruth M. Spadaro, Samuel A. Mitchell
Swift

Summary

The valuation issue in this case was whether the specific and independent fair market value of 376 terminated health insurance group contracts had been sufficiently established to claim a loss deduction and evade the mass asset rule.

See Also

Capital Blue Cross v. Commissioner

Full Text of Court Cases
March 12, 2004

At issue was the value of intangible assets for loss deductions.