‘Plausible’ Patent Infringement Analysis Needs More to Support Lost Profits Award

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 16 No. 10
Legal and Court Case Update
October 2010

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (579 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3679 Electronic Components, NEC
334419 Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
intellectual property
AU Optronics Corp. v. LG Display Co., Ltd.
2010 WL 2720816 (D. Del.)
July 8, 2010
US
Federal Court
Delaware
United States District Court
Vincent K.Yip
Jonathan Putnam (plaintiff)
Farnan

Summary

Court adopts lower-end of expert’s reasonable royalty damages for patent infringement, saying it was not persuaded by top-end patent portfolio/lost profits analysis.

See Also

AU Optronics Corp. v. LG Display Co., Ltd.

Full Text of Court Cases
July 8, 2010

Court adopts lower-end of expert’s reasonable royalty damages for patent infringement, saying it was not persuaded by top-end patent portfolio/lost profits analysis.