Plaintiff Uses Opponent’s Expert Industry Report to Great Advantage

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 5
Legal and Court Case Update
May 2012

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,238 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
1311 Crude Petroleum and Natural Gas
211120 Crude Petroleum Extraction 
contract
Carlton Energy Group, LLC v. Phillips
2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 1299
February 14, 2012
US
State Court
Texas
Court of Appeals
Peter Huddleston and Henry Crichlow (plaintiff)
Jennings

Summary

Court of Appeals reinstates full $66.5 million award for tortious interference with contract to develop natural gas reserves, even though this amount exceeded the valuation by plaintiff’s expert and was most likely derived from defendant’s industry report ...

See Also

Carlton Energy Group, LLC v. Phillips

Full Text of Court Cases
February 14, 2012

Court of Appeals reinstates full $66.5 million award for tortious interference with contract to develop natural gas reserves, even though this amount exceeded the valuation by plaintiff’s expert and was most likely derived from defendant’s industry report ...

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 5
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition