Plaintiff Stakes $1.99 Million Lost Profits Award on Single ‘Benchmark’ Year

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 13 No. 8
Legal and Court Case Update
August 2007

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (772 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
2834 Pharmaceutical Preparations
325412 Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing
economic damages & lost profits
Hinz v. Neuroscience, Inc.
2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39888
May 31, 2007
Federal Court
Minnesota
United States District Court
Aaron W. Davis, Amanda R. Cefalu, Brian L. Stender, Carl S. Wosmek, Henry M. Helgen III
none
Schlitz

Summary

Plaintiff loses $1.99 million lost profits award by relying on flawed benchmark sales data.

See Also

Hinz v. Neuroscience, Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
May 31, 2007

Plaintiff loses $1.99 million lost profits award by relying on flawed benchmark sales data.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 13 No. 8
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition