Summary
The Hawaii Supreme Court affirmed the lower courts' finding that a business started after the parties separated but before the date of the conclusion of the evidentiary part of the trial was a marital asset subject to distribution in divorce under Hawaii ...
See Also
Conen Masaki Nakamura v. Elise Sonoe Nakamura
The Hawaii Supreme Court affirmed the lower courts' finding that a business started after the parties separated but before the date of the conclusion of the evidentiary part of the trial was a marital asset subject to distribution in divorce under Hawaii ...