Not Appropriate to Value a Recovering Business at Its ‘Nadir’

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 9
Legal and Court Case Update
September 2012

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,667 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
1629 Heavy Construction, NEC
237110 Water and Sewer Line and Related Structures Construction
contract
Nordetek Environmental, Inc. v. RDP Technologies, Inc.
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68220
May 16, 2012
US
Federal Court
Pennsylvania
United States District Court
J. Mark Penny and Edward Wilusz (defendant)
Dalzell

Summary

Federal court dismisses expert’s damages calculation of under Daubert for incorrectly applying the diminution of value approach to a recovered business, and for assuming a disputed IP license had no value.

See Also

Nordetek Environmental, Inc. v. RDP Technologies, Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
May 16, 2012

Federal court dismisses expert’s damages calculation of under Daubert for incorrectly applying the diminution of value approach to a recovered business, and for assuming a disputed IP license had no value.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 9
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition