Noncompetitive Factors Must Be Considered When Assessing Damages for a Division of the Market

Business Valuation Update BVLaw
Legal and Court Case Update
July 31, 1998

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (591 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8011 Offices and Clinics of Doctors of Medicine
621111 Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists)
antitrust
Blue Cross and Blue Shield United of Wisconsin, and Compcare Health Services Insurance Corporation v
No. 97-3219 (7th Cir. 1998)
US
Federal Court
7th Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
John Beyer <br> Thomas McGuire <br>
Posner

Summary

The U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's grant of summary judgment against Blue Cross in its antitrust suit against Marshfield Clinics. The clinics were guilty of monopolistic practices (i.e., division of the market).

See Also

Blue Cross and Blue Shield United of Wisconsin, and Compcare Health Services Insurance Corporation v

Full Text of Court Cases
July 31, 1998

The U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's grant of summary judgment against Blue Cross in its antitrust suit against Marshfield Clinics. The clinics were guilty of monopolistic practices (i.e., division of the market).