Nash Bargaining Solution Survives Daubert Challenge, Royalty Analysis Does Not

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 19 No. 6
Legal and Court Case Update
June 2013

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (881 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
4899 Communications Services, NEC
517919 All Other Telecommunications
intellectual property
Virnetx Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (I)
2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28223
March 1, 2013
US
Federal Court
Texas
United States District Court
Roy Weinstein (plaintiff); unknown (defendant)
Davis

Summary

In Daubert ruling federal court finds the plaintiff’s expert violated entire market value rule when calculating a reasonable royalty, the apportionment factor he used to reduce the revenue of entire products was “a poor substitute” for the analysis necess ...

See Also

Virnetx Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (I)

Full Text of Court Cases
March 1, 2013

In Daubert ruling federal court finds the plaintiff’s expert violated entire market value rule when calculating a reasonable royalty, the apportionment factor he used to reduce the revenue of entire products was “a poor substitute” for the analysis necess ...

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 19 No. 6
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition