Minority Discount Can Help Determine Passive Versus Active Appreciation

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 8
Legal and Court Case Update
August 2012

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (929 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
2752 Commercial Printing, Lithographic
323111 Commercial Printing (except Screen and Books)
marital dissolution/divorce
passive appreciation, active appreciation
Iacampo v. Oliver-Iacampo
2012 Ohio. App. LEXIS 1574
April 23, 2012
US
State Court
Ohio
Court of Appeals
Robert Turner (wife)
Trapp

Summary

Appellate court affirms expert testimony regarding factors that contributed to active vs. passive appreciation of the marital business; even though his report didn’t make specific conclusions, it did apply a 10% discount for lack of control, which, while ...

See Also

Iacampo v. Oliver-Iacampo

Full Text of Court Cases
April 23, 2012

Appellate court affirms expert testimony regarding factors that contributed to active vs. passive appreciation of the marital business; even though his report didn’t make specific conclusions, it did apply a 10% discount for lack of control, which, while ...