May IP Experts Rely on Post Hoc Licenses in Calculating Royalties?

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 12
Legal and Court Case Update
December 2012

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (881 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
4841 Cable and Other Pay Television Services
515210 Cable and Other Subscription Programming
intellectual property
ActiveVideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 18032
August 24, 2012
US
Federal Court
Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
unnamed
Moore

Summary

Federal Circuit affirms $115 million damages award for infringement, affirming expert’s reliance on a licensing agreement that took place two years past the date of the hypothetical negotiation.

See Also

ActiveVideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
August 24, 2012

Federal Circuit affirms $115 million damages award for infringement, affirming expert’s reliance on a licensing agreement that took place two years past the date of the hypothetical negotiation.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 12
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition