Latest State Court Rules on Whether Discounts Apply in Shareholder Dissent Cases

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 12 No. 10
Legal and Court Case Update
October 2006

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (787 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5072 Hardware
444130 Hardware Stores
shareholder dissent/oppression
Brown v. Arp and Hammond Hardware Co
2006 Wyo, LEXIS 115
August 29, 2006
US
State Court
Wyoming
Supreme Court
Amanda Hunkins Newton, John B. Speight, Robert T. McCue, Scott W. Meier
Melinda Harper, Eric Six (minority); Chris Treharn (majority)
Burke

Summary

Wyoming Supreme Court joins “vast majority” of states to preclude application of discounts to “fair value” determinations in shareholder oppression cases.

See Also

Brown v. Arp and Hammond Hardware Co

Full Text of Court Cases
August 29, 2006

Wyoming Supreme Court joins “vast majority” of states to preclude application of discounts to “fair value” determinations in shareholder oppression cases.