Lack of Foundation and Relevancy Lead to Exclusion of Expert’s Valuation Testimony

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 11 No. 3
Legal and Court Case Update
March 2005

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (337 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
1021 Copper Ores
212230 Copper, Nickel, Lead, and Zinc Mining
marital dissolution/divorce
Schumann v. Schumann
2005 Ohio 91, 2005 Ohio App. LEXIS 72
January 13, 2005
US
State Court
Ohio
Court of Appeals
Gregory J. Moore, James P. Reddy Jr., John D. Zoller, Joseph G. Stafford, Joyce E. Barrett, Kenneth J. Lewis
Radd Riebe (for wife); Robert Greenwald (for wife)
Calabrese

Summary

One of the issues in this marital dissolution case was whether the trial court had properly stricken the testimony of wife’s valuation expert.

See Also

Schumann v. Schumann

Full Text of Court Cases
January 13, 2005

One of the issues in this marital dissolution case was whether the trial court had properly stricken the testimony of wife’s valuation expert.