IP Valuation Fails to Follow Accepted BV Guidelines in Shareholder Derivative Suit

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 15 No. 7
Legal and Court Case Update
July 2009

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,071 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6794 Patent Owners and Lessors
533110 Lessors of Nonfinancial Intangible Assets (except Copyrighted Works)
fraud
Cemen- Lock v. Gas Technology Institute
2009 WL 855690 (N.D. Ill.)
March 30, 2009
US
Federal Court
Illinois
United States District Court
Ronald Vollmar (plaintiffs)
Pallmeyer

Summary

Court excludes IP valuation evidence under the new business rule but grants new trial because defendants failed to make a sufficient objection during the original proceedings.

See Also

Cement-Lock v. Gas Technology Institute

Full Text of Court Cases
March 30, 2009

Court excludes IP valuation evidence under the new business rule, but grants new trial because defendants failed to make a sufficient objection during the original proceedings.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 15 No. 7
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition