Federal Court Clarifies Rule on Discovery of Draft Valuation Reports

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 13 No. 6
Legal and Court Case Update
June 2007
tort

University of Pittsburgh v. David W. Townsend
2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24620
March 30, 2007
Federal Court
Tennessee
United States District Court
Andrew R. Tillman, Christian M. Best, Daniel F. Diffley, David G. Oberdick, J. Chadwick Hatmaker, J. Patrick Elsevier, John P. Fry, Michael Yablonski, Patrick R. Riley, Randall L. Allen, Travis J. Graham
Robert Woolridge, Thomas Lewellen, Mark Gleason (plaintiff)
Shirley, Jr.

Summary

Court considers motion to exclude expert testimony for their admitted destruction of draft reports and emails and for their use of reasonable royalty methodology.

See Also

University of Pittsburgh v. David W. Townsend

Court considers motion to exclude expert testimony for their admitted destruction of draft reports and emails, and for their use of reasonable royalty methodology.