Federal Circuit Chides Defendants for ‘Improper’ Admissibility Challenge

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 19 No. 8
Legal and Court Case Update
August 2013

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,475 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7372 Prepackaged Software
511210 Software Publishers
intellectual property
damages, lost profits, daubert, reasonable royalty, panduit
Versata Software, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc. (II)
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 8838
May 1, 2013
US
Federal Court
Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Neeraj Gupta, Chris Blackwell, Roy Weinstein (plaintiffs); Michael Wagner (defendants)
Rader

Summary

Federal Circuit affirms lost profits and royalty award finding defendants raised questions of admissibility of plaintiff expert testimony in the “improper context” because these are Daubert issues; also plaintiffs’ lost profits theory meets Panduit requir ...

See Also

Versata Software, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc. (II)

Full Text of Court Cases
May 1, 2013

Federal Circuit affirms lost profits and royalty award finding defendants raised questions of admissibility of plaintiff expert testimony in the “improper context” because these are Daubert issues; also plaintiffs’ lost profits theory meets Panduit requir ...

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 19 No. 8
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition