Fairness Opinion Flawed For Rejecting DCF for Hard-to-Value Company?

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 17 No. 7
Legal and Court Case Update
July 2011

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (817 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
shareholder dissent/oppression
In re Answers Corp. Shareholders Litigation
2011 WL 1366780 (Del. Ch.)
April 11, 2011
US
State Court
Delaware
Court of Chancery
Mary O’Connor (plaintiffs); UBS (company defendant)
Noble

Summary

DE Chancery Court approves sale of hard-to-value internet company, even though lack of any long-term forecasts prevented DCF analysis, and fairness opinion had to rely on market approach despite lack of truly comparable public companies.

See Also

In re Answers Corp. Shareholders Litigation

Full Text of Court Cases
April 11, 2011

DE Chancery Court approves sale of hard-to-value internet company, even though lack of any long-term forecasts prevented DCF analysis, and fairness opinion had to rely on market approach despite lack of truly comparable public companies.