Fair Value Affected by Existence of Stock Options

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 8 No. 10
Legal and Court Case Update
October 2002

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (333 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5941 Sporting Goods Stores and Bicycle Shops
451110 Sporting Goods Stores
shareholder dissent/oppression
fair value
G. I. Joe's Inc v. Nizam
183 Or. App. 116, 50 P.3d 1282, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1191
July 31, 2002
US
State Court
Oregon
Court of Appeals
Greg Gilbert, CFA, ASA, CBA <br> David Shue, CFA, ASA <br> Corporate Valuation, Inc. (court-appointed)
Linder

Summary

The issue in this case was the existence of certain stock options in favor of the company's president, which would affect the value of a dissenting shareholder's shares.

See Also

G. I. Joe's Inc v. Nizam

Full Text of Court Cases
July 31, 2002

The issue in this case was the existence of certain stock options in favor of the company's president, which would affect the value of a dissenting shareholder's shares.