Summary
The Washington Court of Appeals, Division I ruled that a business concept for the manufacture of a synthetic cork conceived during the marriage, but not disclosed as an asset of the marriage was not an asset of value.
See Also
Indra Ozolnieks-Burnell v. Steve Burnell
The Washington Court of Appeals, Division I ruled that a business concept for the manufacture of a synthetic cork conceived during the marriage, but not disclosed as an asset of the marriage was not an asset of value. It determined that the husband was no ...