Expert’s Yardstick Method Excluded Under Daubert for Failing to Perform a Market Analysis in Connection With the Damage Computation

Business Valuation Update BVLaw
Legal and Court Case Update
March 31, 2005

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (572 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3999 Manufacturing Industries, NEC
339999 All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing
intellectual property
daubert, economic damages & lost profits, yardstick analysis
Robert J. Pound v. Airosol Company, Inc.
No. 02-2632-CM (D. Kan. 2005)
US
Federal Court
Kansas
United States District Court
Constance L. Ward, CPA, CVA
Murgia

Summary

The U.S. District Court for Kansas excluded a financial expert’s damage computation under Daubert in this false advertising matter. The expert utilized the yardstick method and a one-to-one sales loss assumption. Because she failed to perform a market ana ...

See Also

Robert J. Pound v. Airosol Company, Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
March 31, 2005

The U.S. District Court for Kansas excluded a financial expert’s damage computation under Daubert in this false advertising matter. The expert utilized the yardstick method and a one-to-one sales loss assumption. Because she failed to perform a market ana ...

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition