Expert’s Unconventional Method to Forecast Lost Profits Satisfies Daubert

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 19 No. 2
Legal and Court Case Update
February 2013

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,078 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3714 Motor Vehicle Parts and Accessories
contract
lost profits, breach of contract, daubert, economic damages & lost profits
RMD, LLC v. Nitto Americas, Inc.
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158107
November 5, 2012
US
Federal Court
Kansas
United States District Court
Marc Vianello (plaintiff); Christopher Pflaum, George McCollister (defendants)
Robinson

Summary

Federal district court finds plaintiff’s expert’s Crystal Ball and Holt Winters methodology to project lost profits admissible under Daubert; method proved reasonable when subsequently tested with regression analysis tool.

See Also

RMD, LLC v. Nitto Americas, Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
November 5, 2012

Federal district court finds plaintiff’s expert’s Crystal Ball and Holt Winters methodology to project lost profits admissible under Daubert; method proved reasonable when subsequently tested with regression analysis tool.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 19 No. 2
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition