Expert May Rely on Revenue-Sharing Agreement to Show Value, But Not Royalty

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 7
Legal and Court Case Update
July 2012

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,055 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7372 Prepackaged Software
511210 Software Publishers
intellectual property
Dataquill Ltd. v. High Tech Computer Corp. (II)
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53164
April 16, 2012
US
Federal Court
California
United States District Court
Joseph Gemini
Gonzalez

Summary

Court excludes portions of expert’s second, supplemental report for failure to explain technical and economic comparability of licenses used to calculate reasonable royalty damages in patent infringement case.

See Also

Dataquill Ltd. v. High Tech Computer Corp. (II)

Full Text of Court Cases
April 16, 2012

Court excludes portions of expert’s second, supplemental report for failure to explain technical and economic comparability of licenses used to calculate reasonable royalty damages in patent infringement case.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 7
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition