Expert Disqualified in Patent Damages Case Is Challenged in Second, Similar Case

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 15 No. 12
Legal and Court Case Update
December 2009

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (547 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5153 Grain and Field Beans
424510 Grain and Field Bean Merchant Wholesalers
intellectual property
Monsanto v. Tidball
2009 WL 2757047 (E.D. Mo.)
August 26, 2009
US
Federal Court
Missouri
United States District Court
Kelley Sill
Perry

Summary

Expert is disqualified from “saved seed” patent infringement case because she: disregarded federal precedent concerning the limits to reasonable royalties in such cases; lacked sufficient expertise; and was just excluded from testifying in a similar case.

See Also

Monsanto v. Tidball

Full Text of Court Cases
August 26, 2009

Expert is disqualified from “saved seed” patent infringement case because she: disregarded federal precedent concerning the limits to reasonable royalties in such cases; lacked sufficient expertise; and was just excluded from testifying in a similar case.