8th Circuit Rejects Discounts for Marketability, Minority in Missouri Dissenting Shareholders' Appeal

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 7 No. 5
Legal and Court Case Update
May 2001

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (992 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3471 Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring
332813 Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring
shareholder dissent/oppression
fair value
Swope v. Siegel-Robert, Inc. (II)
243 F.3d 486, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2760
US
Federal Court
8th Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Robert Reilly (for Swope)<br>Michelle Matava (for Swope)<br>Kenneth Patton (for Siegel-Robert)|Z. Christopher Mercer (for Siegel-Robert)
McMillian

Summary

The 8th Circuit reviewed de novo Swope v. Siegel-Robert, 74 F. Supp. 876 (E.D. Mo. June 23, 1999) (abstracted in BVU October 1999).

See Also

Swope v. Siegel-Robert, Inc. (II)

Full Text of Court Cases
July 18, 2007