Dental Practice May Be the Subject of a Conversion Claim

Business Valuation Update BVLaw
Legal and Court Case Update
July 1, 2004

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (297 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8021 Offices and Clinics of Dentists
621210 Offices of Dentists
economic damages & lost profits
damages, economic damages & lost profits
Lora Elias v. Leonard J. Gammel, Jr.
2004 Ohio 3464
US
State Court
Ohio
Court of Appeals
Mitchell L. Alperin, Paul Mancino Jr.
Gallagher

Summary

The Ohio Court of Appeals, 8th District, concluded that a dental practice could be converted even though it is intangible property.

See Also

Lora Elias v. Leonard J. Gammel, Jr.

Full Text of Court Cases
July 1, 2004

The Ohio Court of Appeals, 8th District, concluded that a dental practice could be converted even though it is intangible property.