Defendant’s Rebuttal of Lost Profits Damages Does Not Form Independent Basis for Award

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 16 No. 12
Legal and Court Case Update
December 2010

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (679 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3714 Motor Vehicle Parts and Accessories
336310 Motor Vehicle Gasoline Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing
tort
Glattly v. Air Starter Components, Inc.
2010 WL 3928480 (Tex. App.-Hous. (1 Dist))
October 7, 2010
US
State Court
Texas
Court of Appeals
Patrice Ferguson (plaintiff); James Bratic (defendant)
Alcala

Summary

Court reverses $770,000 jury award for tortious interference and misappropriation of trade secrets based on expert’s failure to show that plaintiff would have made 100% of defendant sales.

See Also

Glattly v. Air Starter Components, Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
October 7, 2010

Court reverses $770,000 jury award for tortious interference and misappropriation of trade secrets based on expert’s failure to show that plaintiff would have made 100% of defendant sales.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 16 No. 12
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition