Defendant Tries Every Pretrial Tactic to Avoid Trial on Patent Damages

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 5
Legal and Court Case Update
May 2012

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,284 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3841 Surgical and Medical Instruments and Apparatus
339112 Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing
intellectual property
damages, economic damages & lost profits, patent
University of Pittsburgh v. Varian Medical Systems, Inc.
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17162
February 10, 2012
US
Federal Court
Pennsylvania
United States District Court
John Hansen (plaintiff); Bruce McFarlane (defendant)
Schwab

Summary

District court finds that entire market value rule applies only when unpatented features are combined with patented invention, denying this and numerous other objections by defendant to plaintiff’s reasonable royalty calculations.

See Also

University of Pittsburgh v. Varian Medical Systems, Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
February 10, 2012

District court finds that entire market value rule applies only when unpatented features are combined with patented invention, denying this and numerous other objections by defendant to plaintiff’s reasonable royalty calculations.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 5
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition