Creating ‘But-for’ World of Patent Damages Is Not the Same as ‘Fantasy’ World

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 16 No. 5
Legal and Court Case Update
May 2010

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (537 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3949 Sporting and Athletic Goods, NEC
339920 Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing
intellectual property
expert testimony
Calloway Golf Co. v. Acushnet Co.
2010 WL 725728 (D. Del.)
August 14, 2009
US
Federal Court
Delaware
United States District Court
Richard L Stanley
Brian Napper (plaintiff)
Robinson

Summary

Court denies Daubert challenge to patent damages expert, holding that financial proof of lost profits need not create “fantasy” world, only a “but for” world.

See Also

Calloway Golf Co. v. Acushnet Co.

Full Text of Court Cases
August 14, 2009

Court denies Daubert challenge to patent damages expert, holding that financial proof of lost profits need not create “fantasy” world, only a “but for” world.