Court of Appeals Holds That Trial Court Erred by Not Including Appreciation of Husband's 50% Share in Auto Dealership as a Marital Asset

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 8 No. 9
Legal and Court Case Update
September 2002

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (49 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5521 Motor Vehicle Dealers (Used Only)
441120 Used Car Dealers
marital dissolution/divorce
marital dissolution
Craft v. Craft
825 So. 2d 605, 2002 Miss. LEXIS 186
June 6, 2002
US
State Court
Mississippi
Supreme Court
Jim Koerber, CPA/ABV, CVA (for wife); Angela T. Herzog, CPA (for husband)
Diaz

Summary

The Court of Appeals held that the trial court erred by not including the appreciation of husband's 50% share of Craft Auto Sales as a marital asset.

See Also

Craft v. Craft

Full Text of Court Cases
June 6, 2002

The court of appeals held that the trial court erred by not including the appreciation of husband's 50% share of Craft Auto Sales as a marital asset.