Courts Wrestle With Discount Rate for Future Stock Price Increase

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 20 No. 6
Legal and Court Case Update
June 2014

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,357 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
4215 Courier Services Except by Air
492110 Couriers and Express Delivery Services
contract
cost of capital, discount rate, restricted stock approach, front pay damages, lost future benefits
Hardenbrook v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15830
February 7, 2014
US
Federal Court
Idaho
United States District Court
Dennis Reinstein (plaintiff-employee); Cornelius Hofman (defendant)
Lodge

Summary

In retaliation suit requiring valuation of company restricted stock, district court, despite hesitation, affirms expert’s proposed zero percent net discount rate finding expert provided some support for it.

See Also

Hardenbrook v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
February 7, 2014

In retaliation suit requiring valuation of company restricted stock, district court, despite hesitation, affirms expert’s proposed zero percent net discount rate finding expert provided some support for it.