Court Vacates $9 Million Baseline Royalty Rate Under Uniloc

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 3
Legal and Court Case Update
March 2012

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (752 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3841 Surgical and Medical Instruments and Apparatus
339112 Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing
intellectual property
Spine Solutions, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.
No. 2:07-02175-JPM-dkv (W.D. Tenn.)
November 23, 2011
US
Federal Court
Tennessee
United States District Court
unnamed
McCalla

Summary

Court grants new trial on damages, based on Federal Circuit’s decision in Uniloc abolishing the 25% Rule in calculating reasonable royalty for patent infringement.

See Also

Spine Solutions, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
November 23, 2011

Court grants new trial on damages, based on Federal Circuit’s decision in Uniloc abolishing the 25% Rule in calculating reasonable royalty for patent infringement.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 18 No. 3
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition