Court rejects adjustment for post-separation efforts

Business Valuation Update BVLaw
Legal and Court Case Update
July 11, 2001

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (688 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6282 Investment Advice
523920 Portfolio Management
marital dissolution/divorce
marital dissolution
In re the Marriage of Duncan
108 Cal. Rptr. 2d 833, 2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 533
US
State Court
California
Court of Appeals
Kenneth Bodenstein (for wife); Jeffrey Lovell (for husband); Donald Gursey (for husband)
Kremer

Summary

The issue appealed from the Duncan marital dissolution concerned the value of an investment advisory company.

See Also

In re the Marriage of Duncan

Full Text of Court Cases
July 11, 2001

At issue is the valuation of husband's interest in an investment advisory business.