Court finds no intangibles

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 4 No. 10
Legal and Court Case Update
October 1998

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (112 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8711 Engineering Services
541330 Engineering Services
marital dissolution/divorce
asset approach, marital dissolution
Briskey v. Briskey
1998 Ohio App. LEXIS 3423
July 23, 1998
US
State Court
Ohio
Court of Appeals
Carl J. Monastra (for wife)
Karpinski

Summary

Among other issues, wife contests assigned value of husband's consulting business - a sole proprietorship. Wife's expert, Carl J. Monastra, was found to be unreliable by Court, except for ...

See Also

Briskey v. Briskey

Full Text of Court Cases
July 23, 1998

One issue was whether the trial court abused its discretion when it ignored the testimony of one of the experts.