Court Excludes Pro Forma-Based Economic Damages Analysis

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 22 No. 2
Legal and Court Case Update
February 2016

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,794 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5411 Grocery Stores
445110 Supermarkets and Other Grocery Retailers (except Convenience Retailers)
contract
damages, daubert, expert testimony, admissibility, discounted cash flow (DCF), reliability, projections
Bruno v. Bozzuto’s, Inc.
2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156339
November 19, 2015
US
Federal Court
Pennsylvania
United States District Court
James N. Dragotto, Dr. Murli Rajan (plaintiffs); John A. Slavek, David M. Duffus (defendant)
Brann

Summary

Court excludes plaintiffs’ DCF-based damages calculation, finding it suffers from “garbage-in, garbage-out” problem; plaintiffs’ experts based cash flow analysis on defendant’s preliminary projections rather than subsequently available actual sales data.

See Also

Bruno v. Bozzuto’s, Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
November 19, 2015

Court excludes plaintiffs’ DCF-based damages calculation, finding it suffers from “garbage-in, garbage-out” problem; plaintiffs’ experts based cash flow analysis on defendant’s preliminary projections rather than subsequently available actual sales data.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 22 No. 2
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition