Court Declares Lost Profits Analysis ‘Goes Too Far’

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 21 No. 5
Legal and Court Case Update
May 2015

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,591 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7371 Computer Programming Services
541511 Custom Computer Programming Services
intellectual property
lost profits, daubert, reasonable royalty, rule 702, infringement
Immersion Corp. v. HTC Corp.
2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21555
February 24, 2015
US
Federal Court
Delaware
United States District Court
James Pampinella (plaintiff); unknown (defendants)
Andrews

Summary

Court says nontraditional lost profits theory goes “too far” as it assumes sales occurred pursuant to a license the parties negotiated but never actually executed and assumes revenue derived not only from patents-in-suit, but also related unpatented softw ...

See Also

Immersion Corp. v. HTC Corp.

Full Text of Court Cases
February 24, 2015

Court says nontraditional lost profits theory goes “too far” as it assumes sales occurred pursuant to a license the parties negotiated but never actually executed and assumes revenue derived not only from patents-in-suit, but also related unpatented softw ...

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 21 No. 5
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition