Court Decides Daubert Attack ‘Misses the Mark’

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 22 No. 2
Legal and Court Case Update
February 2016

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,090 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3564 Industrial and Commercial Fans and Blowers and Air Purification Equipment
333413 Industrial and Commercial Fan and Blower and Air Purification Equipment Manufacturing
intellectual property
damages, lost profits, daubert, expert testimony, admissibility
Deflecto, LLC v. Dundas Jafine Inc.
2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149447
November 4, 2015
US
Federal Court
Missouri
United States District Court
Marc Vianello (plaintiff); unknown (defendant)
Smith

Summary

Court calls Daubert challenger’s attack on expert’s lost profits opinion “misguided”; it unduly focuses on expert’s familiarity with legal standards and fails to explain what is wrong with expert’s use of software program for projecting future damages.

See Also

Deflecto, LLC v. Dundas Jafine Inc.

Full Text of Court Cases
November 4, 2015

Court calls Daubert challenger’s attack on expert’s lost profits opinion “misguided”; it unduly focuses on expert’s familiarity with legal standards and fails to explain what is wrong with expert’s use of software program for projecting future damages.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 22 No. 2
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition