Court Awards $15 Million Damages Based on Discounted Cash Flow

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 3 No. 3
Legal and Court Case Update
March 1997

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (431 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7997 Membership Sports and Recreation Clubs
713940 Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
malpractice (legal)
damages, economic damages & lost profits
Beverly Hills Concepts v. Schatz & Schatz (I)
1997 Conn. Super. LEXIS 178
January 27, 1997
US
State Court
Connecticut
Superior Court
Brian Wolfe and Irwin Hochberg (for defendant) <br>Harold Brown and Tom Ferreira (for plaintiff)
Hale

Summary

At issue is a legal malpractice action the corporate plaintiff, Beverly Hills Concepts Inc., brought against the law firm of Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & Kotkin.

See Also

Beverly Hills Concepts v. Schatz & Schatz (I)

Full Text of Court Cases
January 27, 1997

At issue is in this legal practice case is the establishment of expert testimony and circumstancial evidence.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 3 No. 3
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition