Court accepts DCF over excess earnings method

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 2 No. 11
Legal and Court Case Update
November 1996

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (376 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
4741 Rental of Railroad Cars
532411 Commercial Air, Rail, and Water Transportation Equipment Rental and Leasing
marital dissolution/divorce
Giuffre v. Baker
1996 Ohio App. LEXIS 3673
August 30, 1996
US
State Court
Ohio
Court of Appeals
Betty J. Roberts (for wife); Michael E. Good (for husband)
Nader

Summary

The issues in this case are: (1) the amount of the asset that is marital property; and (2) the degree of the trial court's latitude in accepting one expert's value over another.

See Also

Giuffre v. Baker

Full Text of Court Cases
August 30, 1996

At issue is the valuation of husband's interest in Arthur Corporation and whether the trial court erred in adopting the valuation of wife's expert for the Arthur Corporation.