Consideration of Lawful Competitive Activity Is Required in Lost Profits Analysis

Business Valuation Update BVLaw
Legal and Court Case Update
May 17, 2005

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (403 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
2099 Food Preparations, NEC
311830 Tortilla Manufacturing
antitrust
El Aguila Food Products, Inc., et al. v. Gruma Corporation
No. 04-20125 (5th Cir. 2005)
US
Federal Court
5th Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
Lee Lott, Kenneth McCoin
Smith

Summary

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed a district court’s exclusion of a financial expert in this antitrust action because the expert failed to consider the effects of lawful competition and did not consider the comparability of the plaintiff.

See Also

El Aguila Food Products, Inc., et al. v. Gruma Corporation

Full Text of Court Cases
May 17, 2005

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed a district court’s exclusion of a financial expert in this antitrust action because the expert failed to consider the effects of lawful competition and did not consider the comparability of the plaintiff.

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition