Conservative Assumptions Help Support Expert’s Lost Profits Calculations

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 15 No. 8
Legal and Court Case Update
August 2009

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (885 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6794 Patent Owners and Lessors
533110 Lessors of Nonfinancial Intangible Assets (except Copyrighted Works)
Ice Corp. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp.
2009 WL 1269477 (D. Kan.)
May 7, 2009
US
Federal Court
Kansas
United States District Court
Marc Vianello (plaintiffs)
Robinson

Summary

Financial expert uses conservative assumptions regarding production, pricing, and duration of contract in calculating plaintiff’s lost profits claims for misappropriation of trade secrets.

See Also

Ice Corp. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp.

Full Text of Court Cases
May 7, 2009

Financial expert uses conservative assumptions regarding production, pricing, and duration of contract in calculating plaintiff’s lost profits claims for misappropriation of trade secrets.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 15 No. 8
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition