Colorado Supreme Court Affirms Court of Appeals; No Marketability Discounts in Dissenters' Rights Cases as a Matter of Law

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 9 No. 3
Legal and Court Case Update
March 2003

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,286 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6022 State Commercial Banks
522190 Other Depository Credit Intermediation
shareholder dissent/oppression
Pueblo Bancorporation v. Lindoe, Inc. (II)
63 P.3d 353, 2003 Colo. LEXIS 53
January 21, 2003
US
State Court
Colorado
Supreme Court
Leslie A. Pattern, CPA, CVA (for Pueblo) <br> Z. Christopher Mercer, ASA, CFA (for Lindoe) <br> Gerald A. Feil (for Lindoe) <br> Charles W. Murdock (for Linda)
Rice

Summary

In this case, Pueblo Bancorporation appealed the Court of Appeals' reversal of the trial court's determination of the shares owned by Lindoe Inc., a minority shareholder of Pueblo.

See Also

Pueblo Bancorporation v. Lindoe, Inc. (II)

Full Text of Court Cases
January 21, 2003

At issue is the application of a lack of marketability discount for the value of shares owned by the minority shareholder, Lindoe, Inc., in Pueblo Bancorporation.