Application of Discounts Inappropriate

Business Valuation Update BVLaw
Legal and Court Case Update
August 16, 2001

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (557 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
6712 Offices of Bank Holding Companies
551111 Offices of Bank Holding Companies
shareholder dissent/oppression
fair value, s corporation, pro rata value
Pueblo Bancorporation v. Lindoe, Inc. (I)
37 P.3d 492, 2001 Colo. App. LEXIS 1330
US
State Court
Colorado
Court of Appeals
Leslie A. Patten, CPA, CVA (for Pueblo)<br>Z. Christopher Mercer, ASA, CFA (for Lindoe)<br>Gerald A. Feil (for Lindoe)|Charles W. Murdock (for Lindoe)
Roy

Summary

The Colorado Court of Appeals considered the valuation of a bank holding company in this dissenting shareholder action. It determined that minority interest and lack of marketability discounts were inappropriate in dissenting shareholder actions as a matt ...

See Also

Pueblo Bancorporation v. Lindoe, Inc. (I)

Full Text of Court Cases
August 16, 2001

At issue is the valuation of shareholders stock in plaintiff, Pueblo Bancorporation.