Summary
Appellate court confirms trial court’s discounting of hog confinement facilities based on testimony of industry expert regarding “troubled” state of the industry; and further, it appropriately excluded considerations of tax consequences.
See Also
In re Marriage of Erpelding
Appellate court confirms trial court’s discounting of hog confinement facilities based on testimony of industry expert regarding “troubled” state of the industry; and further, it appropriately excluded considerations of tax consequences.