Allowable Assumptions vs. Legal Conclusions: Financial Experts Tread a Fine Line

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 16 No. 12
Legal and Court Case Update
December 2010

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (520 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
7922 Theatrical Producers (Except Motion Picture) and Miscellaneous Theatrical Services
711110 Theater Companies and Dinner Theaters
intellectual property
Baisden v. I’m Ready Productions, Inc. (II)
2010 WL 3766533 (S.D. Tex.)
September 22, 2010
US
Federal Court
Texas
United States District Court
Karl Weisheit (defendant)
Johnson

Summary

Court admits financial expert’s contract interpretations that are consistent with the court’s, but excludes his legal conclusions regarding causation.

See Also

Baisden v. I’m Ready Productions, Inc. (II)

Full Text of Court Cases
September 22, 2010

Court admits financial expert’s contract interpretations that are consistent with the court’s, but excludes his legal conclusions regarding causation.