Accounts receivable and work-in-progress included in law firm valuation

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 10 No. 5
Legal and Court Case Update
May 2004

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
Already a subscriber?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (290 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
8111 Legal Services
541110 Offices of Lawyers
marital dissolution/divorce
marital dissolution, partnership agreement, accounts receivable
Rubino v. Rubino
2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1973
February 23, 2004
US
State Court
New York
Supreme Court
Caroline Krauss-Browne, George J. Calcagnini, Sheila Ginsberg Riesel
Altman

Summary

The issue in this case was whether the trial court correctly rejected the court appointed expert’s valuation of husband’s partnership interest in his law firm.

See Also

Rubino v. Rubino

Full Text of Court Cases
February 23, 2004

Attorney husband argues that accounts receivable and work in progress should not be valued as per partnership agreement, but judgment is affirmed.