A Time Limit on Use of Destruction of Business Method?

Business Valuation UpdateVol. 20 No. 9
Legal and Court Case Update
September 2014

Access the Full Article

This article is available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (1,508 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
3555 Printing Trades Machinery and Equipment
333244 Printing Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing
economic damages & lost profits
lost profits, breach of contract, daubert, expert testimony, income approach, causation, fair market value (FMV), projections, destruction of business method
MacDermid Printing Solutions, Inc. v Cortron Corp.
2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79940
June 12, 2014
US
Federal Court
Connecticut
United States District Court
James A. Levinsohn (plaintiff/counterclaimant); John H. Kramer (defendant/counterclaimant)
Shea

Summary

Court finds damages expert’s use of destruction of business method is not improper despite a four-year gap between the alleged offending conduct and the company’s demise, and it does not render his calculation inadmissible under Daubert.

See Also

MacDermid Printing Solutions, Inc. v Cortron Corp.

Full Text of Court Cases
June 12, 2014

Court finds damages expert’s use of destruction of business method is not improper despite a four-year gap between the alleged offending conduct and the company’s demise, and it does not render his calculation inadmissible under Daubert.

This article also appears in:
Business Valuation UpdateVol. 20 No. 9
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition