Zinn v. Seruga

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
September 28, 2009

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in these products:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (6,269 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5084 Industrial Machinery and Equipment
423830 Industrial Machinery and Equipment Merchant Wholesalers
intellectual property
Zinn v. Seruga
2009 WL 3128353 (D. N.J.)
US
Federal Court
New Jersey
United States District Court
William Morrison (plaintiff/husband); Richard Lane (defendant/wife)
Brown

Summary

Ex-spouses claim trademark infringement; court finds ex-husband liable and assesses damages based on expert evidence of gross infringing (but not competing) sales, multiplied by estimated profit margins.
Zinn v. Seruga
PDF, Size: 329 KB

See Also

Proving Trademark Violation Complicated by Claims Between ‘Bitter’ Ex-Spouses

Legal and Court Case Update
December 2009

Ex-spouses claim trademark infringement; court finds ex-husband liable and assesses damages based on expert evidence of gross infringing (but not competing) sales, multiplied by estimated profit margins.

This article also appears in:
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Fourth Edition
Intellectual Property Valuation Case Law Compendium, Second Edition