Wright v. Old Gringo, Inc.

BVLaw
Full Text of Court Cases
February 21, 2020

Access the Full Article

This article and its downloads are available with a subscription to any of these products:
It is also available in this product:
Already a subscriber or product owner?  Login
This article is also available for purchase. (3,811 words)   Add to Cart >>
Need help? Contact us:
1-503-479-8200 ext 2 or sales@bvresources.com
5661 Shoe Stores
448210 Shoe Stores
discovery
expert testimony, appraisal, discovery, economic damages & lost profits, expert report, Rule 26
Wright v. Old Gringo, Inc.
2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30476; 2020 WL 874033
US
Federal Court
California
United States District Court
Joshua Vanetti (plaintiff); Robert Taylor (defendants)
Berg

Summary

Court denies defendants’ Rule 37 motion to exclude opposing expert’s report and testimony; court notes reason for expert report’s lateness was defendants’ litigation strategy, including efforts to thwart production of financial information vital for valuation of company and damages calculation.
Wright v. Old Gringo, Inc.
PDF, Size: 215 KB

See Also

Court Finds Delayed Disclosure of Expert’s Complete Report ‘Substantially Justified’

Court Case Digests
February 21, 2020

Court denies defendants’ Rule 37 motion to exclude opposing expert’s report and testimony; court notes reason for expert report’s ...

This article also appears in:
The Comprehensive Guide to Economic Damages, Seventh Edition